Safer Soil Stronger Roots

Legal Accountability for Agricultural Health Risks

Legal actions are mounting as those affected seek to hold manufacturers accountable for their role in these health risks.

This overview highlights key legislative efforts, ongoing lawsuits, and the broader public health response to address the dangers posed by toxic chemicals in agricultural products.

State Legislation Limiting Manufacturer Accountability. In recent years, several states have introduced laws that protect pesticide manufacturers from certain liabilities:​

  • Iowa’s Proposed Bill: This legislation aims to prevent individuals from suing pesticide manufacturers over health risks, provided the product labels are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Critics argue it would hinder accountability for health issues linked to pesticide exposure.
  • ​Tennessee’s Consideration: Tennessee lawmakers are debating a bill that would grant pesticide companies immunity from specific class action lawsuits, effectively shielding them from liability for illnesses caused by pesticide exposure.
  • Federal Efforts: At the federal level, a provision in the 2024 Farm Bill proposes overriding state pesticide regulations with weaker federal standards. This could lead to the loss of state-level protections, such as bans on certain harmful pesticides.

Legislative Efforts to Enhance Manufacturer Accountability. Conversely, some legislative initiatives aim to increase corporate responsibility in agriculture:​

  • Industrial Agriculture Accountability Act: Introduced by Senator Cory Booker, this bill seeks to hold corporations operating factory farms accountable for environmental and public health harms, aiming to shift liability from farmers to the corporations that control industrial agricultural operations.

  • FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA): Enacted in 2011, the FSMA grants the FDA authority to regulate food safety proactively, requiring food producers to implement preventive controls and allowing the FDA to mandate recalls of contaminated products. While primarily focused on food safety, it influences agricultural practices and manufacturer responsibilities.

OUR SPOT LIT CASE:

Paraquat and Parkinson’s Disease: Legal Actions

Paraquat is a widely used herbicide in agriculture. Studies have established a connection between paraquat exposure and an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) has highlighted that pesticides like paraquat contribute to the onset and progression of Parkinson’s disease. 

  • Lawsuits Against Manufacturers: Farmers and agricultural workers who have been exposed to paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease have initiated legal actions against its manufacturers, notably Syngenta and Chevron. These lawsuits allege that the companies were aware of the potential health risks associated with paraquat but failed to adequately warn users. As of August 2024, over 5,700 cases are pending in the paraquat multidistrict litigation in the U.S., with the first of 10 bellwether trials scheduled to begin in 2024.

  • Recent Legal Developments: In December 2024, a significant development occurred when a key expert witness for the plaintiffs was excluded from testifying due to concerns about the methodology used in their analysis. This decision was upheld by a California state judge, presenting challenges for the plaintiffs in proving a direct causal link between paraquat exposure and Parkinson’s disease. Reuters.


Regulatory and Public Health Responses

  • Ongoing Reviews and Debates: The debate over paraquat’s safety continues globally. In Australia, a review of paraquat’s health impacts has been extended until late 2025 to allow for thorough analysis of public submissions and scientific data. This extension reflects ongoing concerns about the herbicide’s potential link to Parkinson’s disease. History of Paraquat
  • Calls for Bans and Restrictions: In the UK, there have been calls to ban the production of paraquat due to its association with Parkinson’s disease. While its use is prohibited, manufacturing and exporting continue, raising ethical and health concerns. Reports have highlighted incidents of poisoning in countries like Brazil, where paraquat is still used, leading to increased public health advocacy for stricter regulations. The Guardian.

These legislative developments reflect the complex and evolving landscape of agricultural law, balancing corporate accountability, and public health of farmers and gardeners. Together, we can advocate for cleaner, safer products for everyone and ensure that those working hard to feed our society aren’t harmed in the process.

Let’s Connect
Safer Soil Stronger Roots

©2025 Safer Soil Stronger Roots All Rights Reserved

https://safersoiladvocates.org